Barrier Structure Material Options Made Crystal Clear
Wed, 01/14/2009 - 9:25am
The use of a clear barrier packaging may often be the first choice of a device manufacturer for their product, but performance concerns may cause them to reconsider that option. However, significant advances in the materials have enabled medical device makers to take advantage of this ideal alternative to more traditional, non-transparent packaging. This article reviews the various materials and provides benefits of each.
Dhuanne Dodrill is the president of Rollprint Packaging Products. The company is a full-service manufacturer of flexible packaging materials. Dodrill can be reached at 630-628-1700 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Clear barrier packaging materials play an increasingly important role when designing packaging solutions for sensitive materials. Product visibility allows for packaged product inspection via vision systems and metal detectors as well as manual visual inspection by both the manufacturer and the end user. Because any printing on the device or on labels inside the package can be seen, the labeling process can be simplified, reducing the risk of labeling mix-ups and further promoting patient safety. With the advances that have been made in clear barrier materials, this can be achieved without compromising the barrier properties. In fact, barrier levels that are comparable or even exceed those of thin-gauge aluminum foils can be achieved with today's clear materials.
Clear high-barrier materials are available in two forms: barrier films and barrier coatings. For more complex applications, combinations of films and coatings may be required. In order to understand the barrier that will be provided by the finished package, it is important to factor in not only the permeation through the face of the material but also the ingress through the seal. The sealants used in packaging materials often pr ovide little barrier to gasses. As a result, ingress through the seal can result in a significant barrier loss. Ingress through the seal can be theoretically calculated or determined through whole package barrier testing.
•Mole PercentAs the ethylene mole percent increases, the barrier decreases.
•Degree of CrystallinityAs the degree of crystallinity increases, the barrier properties improve.
•ThicknessAs with all films, as the thickness increases, the barrier increases.
•TemperatureAs the temperature increases, the barrier decreases.
•HumidityAt high humidity levels, the barrier provided by EVOH drops rapidly. Note: it is the humidity level at the EVOH interface rather than ambient humidity that is critical.
In addition to providing excellent oxygen barrier, EVOH is also an excellent odor and aroma barrier. It has the added advantage of being thermoformable, making it popular for three-dimensional applications. EVOH has a long history and is well understood.
PCTFEPolychlorotriflouroethylene (PCTFE or Aclar) film provides excellent moisture barrier. It is available as a copolymer or a homopolymer with water vapor transmission rates of approximately 0.038 g-mil/100in2-day and 0.016 g-mil/100in2-day respectively. PCTFE is commonly used in blister (thermoformed) packages where moisture barrier is required. It is inert, chemically resistant, has excellent clarity, and, unlike many barrier materials, it is flex-crack resistant.
The barrier level of PVdC coatings are dependent upon the coating thickness. Much lower transmission rates can be achieved by applying significantly more coating as is common in the pharmaceutical industry.
Because PVdC contains chlorine, hydrochloric acid can be generated under certain conditions. As a result, specialized equipment must be used to apply the coating and the proper equipment must be used if the packaging material is to be incinerated.
Silicon/Aluminum OxideSilicon Oxide (SiOx) coatings are generally applied as a vacuum deposition onto films such as polyester and nylon. SiOx coatings provide excellent oxygen and water vapor barrier properties in a variety of ranges.
A concern is often expressed regarding the ability of silicon oxide coatings to maintain their barrier when flexed. The reality is that most grades perform favorably when compared to aluminum foil and metallized composites. For more demanding applications, there are grades available that provide tremendous flex-crack resistance. The table details the transmission rates of a variety of substrates after flexing.
SiOx and Al2O3 coatings are available in grades appropriate for retort/autoclave applications.
The conventional wisdom is that composite packaging materials that use SiOx or Al2O3 coatings as the barrier will be more expensive than aluminum foil composites. This conclusion is often reached after comparing the cost of the base aluminum foil (unlaminated) to the base SiOx or Al2O3 coated product. However, it ignores the fact that aluminum foil must be protected on both sides whereas the SiOx or Al2O3 coated product may only need a sealant. The cost of the additional layer and processing necessary for aluminum foil often results in a composite structure that is more expensive than a comparable SiOx or Al2O3 composite.
ConclusionFigure 1 displays the relative barrier properties of barrier materials discussed here as they compare to "standard" packaging materials, thin gauge aluminum foils, and metallized films. This chart clearly shows that clear barrier materials can outperform metallized films and even thin gauge foil.
While the assumption is often that aluminum foil provides a total barrier, pinholes that are inherently present in thin gauge aluminum foil will impact barrier. As the thickness of aluminum foil decreases, the level of pinholes dramatically increases. Figure 2 illustrates the affect of pinholes on water vapor transmission rate as detailed in ASTM B479 Standard Specification for Annealed Aluminum and Aluminum-Alloy Foil for Flexible Barrier, Food Contact, and Other Applications.
There is no one ideal barrier material for all products. Achieving the correct balance of barrier, performance, and economics is very much application dependent. Considerations include:
•Type of barrier needed for the application (oxygen, water vapor, aroma, chemical, ultra-violet light, and/or microbial barriers are common needs)
•The product itself and its compatibility with the packaging materials (for example, many options can be ruled out if the product contains water, is chemically active, or is sharp.)
•The equipment that will be used to process the packaging material
•The sterilization method (if applicable)
•Specific environmental and/or disposal requirements
•The cost of the packaging system
With the advances in SiOx and Al2O3 coated products, clear barrier options exist that can provide barrier properties comparable to or even better than aluminum foil and often at a lower price. Today, even the most demanding products can be packaged in clear materials.
OnlineFor additional information on the technologies and products discussed in this article, see MDT online at www.mdtmag.com or Rollprint Packaging Products Inc. at www.rollprint.com.