Developing a Strategy for Global Development Teams
A versatile regulatory compliance strategy is crucial to tapping into the expertise of global product development teams. This article outlines four steps to achieving a successful solution.The FDA has recently changed its position on electronic records and signatures, promising more rigorous compliance audits to monitor their use.
AT A GLANCE
Benefits to team members
Problems to avoid
Dan Marinsik is vice president of quality assurance and regulatory affairs for the Worldwide Medical Division of Sanmina-SCI, 2000 Ringwood Ave., San Jose, CA 95131. He oversees regulatory compliance and quality standards for one of the largest medical device contract manufacturers in the world. He has established an internal regulatory infrastructure to complement Sanmina-SCI's design, engineering, manufacturing, and global distribution capabilities. Under his guidance, Sanmina-SCI has obtained FDA registration and ISO 13485/88 certification for its international medical facilities. In addition, it has harmonized nine medical manufacturing plants and another five medical design centers under one documented QSR-compliant quality system. Marinsik, who has 15 years of senior management experience in the medical device industry, can be reached at 408-202-2008 or firstname.lastname@example.org.By Dan MarinsikMaintaining regulatory compliance in an ever-evolving medical industry can challenge even the most experienced of medical manufacturers. Within the last decade, advances in travel and technology have provided greater access to global markets and international engineering talents, encouraging many medical manufacturers to assemble global product development teams. These teams can provide added engineering expertise and proximity to international markets at a lower overall cost.
With these advantages, come potential risks. Many international engineering resources are inexperienced with the mandates of FDA and ISO. Furthermore, cultural, geographic, and linguistic barriers can hamper communication among team members stationed in different countries. These risks, if not closely monitored, can derail a development project and cost a medical company time, money, and reputation.
Step #1: Design Process
The first step in creating a successful regulatory strategy is to establish a detailed design process. A detailed design process will ensure that all team members have clear expectations as to what the project entails from documentation to deliverables. The design process should first identify the end market where the product will be sold. It should then identify the regulatory requirements for that market, make provisions for each requirement, and then clearly define all deliverables needed to satisfy those requirements.
Step #2: TrainingEven after establishing and clearly defining a design process and its requirements, it is not uncommon to find that different team members located in different countries will interpret the process differently. Therefore, the second step is to ensure that all team members share a thorough and uniform understanding of the design process. This goal can be achieved through team training, where a single, authoritative sourcepreferably a corporate trainercan present the rules and expectations of the design process clearly and thoroughly to the entire group.
Step #3: Risk Analysis
Team members should continue identifying risks as the development process continues, reviewing and updating risk-analysis documentation during each phase of the design process. Frequent review will help prevent residual risk from surfacing during the latter stages of product development, such as in the verification or validation phase, or even worse, in the manufacturing phase, where it becomes more costly for the company and more dangerous for the customer.
Step #4: Electronic Files
Like any other process or system used in the development of medical devices, electronic document approval and storage systems require proper validation to ensure they perform as intended. The FDA has recently changed its position on electronic records and signatures, promising more rigorous compliance audits to monitor their use. The extra validation processes and closer attention by the FDA may seem daunting, but these electronic databaseswhen used with frequent video teleconferences and comprehensive design reviewscan virtually eliminate geographic barriers between team members and convert a global development team into a close-knit, effective design group.
A versatile regulatory compliance strategy is the key for medical manufacturers to effectively tap into the expertise of global product development teams. By investing in the proper tools, training, documentation, and communication systems, medical manufacturers can enjoy the benefits and limit the risks of committing to a truly global product development program.