Sterilization is a standard process for many medical devices. As such, careful consideration has to be given to the materials used in a device that will require a specific type of sterilization method as some materials will not react well to certain processes. This article reviews the most common sterilization methods and specifically notes how they will affect silicone in a medical device.
By Dr. Summer L. Sivas and Brian T. Reilly
Summer L. Sivas, Ph.D. is the technical specialist at NuSil Technology, LLC, responsible for researching new emerging technology and technical information. Brian T. Reilly is the product director for Healthcare Materials at Nusil. Dr. Sivas can be reached at 805-566-2850 or email@example.com and Reilly can be reached at 805-566-4119 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
A typical steam autoclave
Dry heat or steam autoclaving will most likely have little effect on silicone's physical properties because of its moisture and heat resistance. Dry heat sterilization is typically used for sterilizing lightly to moderately crosslinked unfilled silicones known as silicone gels. Steam autoclave is commonly used to sterilize reusable medical devices. This method is typically not recommended for use on medical grade adhesives since many substrates and adhesives do not survive well under the high-pressure steam environment.1 The drawback to heat sterilization of silicone materials is that the high heat may cause the silicone to expand which must be taken into consideration in how the device is configured and packaged.
EtO is a chemical steriliant small enough to penetrate the microbial cells destroying nuclear cell components.2 Silicones generally have a high permeability to gases compared to most elastomeric materials,3 permitting the small EtO molecules to diffuse through the polymer network, inducing sterilization throughout the polymer matrix. The only precaution is to ensure that all of the EtO has been removed from the silicone device before it is used, which usually takes 24 hours.4
Gamma radiation and e-beam are alternative sterilization methods for heat sensitive devices and devices that are not permeable to gasses used in chemical sterilization. A major concern for many device manufacturers is that radiation may damage or degrade polymeric materials. Unwanted crosslinking of the polymer network or chain scissioning are the two major mechanisms of change observed by radiation sterilization. The result can be net loss of flexibility, tensile strength, elongation, and/or an increase in durometer. Chain scissioning-the random rupturing of bonds-creates low molecular weight fragments that may lead to gas evolution and unsaturated bonds that will reduce the molecular weight of the polymer.5 Since these losses may be within the application's specification limits, the minor loss in physical properties may not adversely affect the device's ultimate function. Polymers containing aromatic groups, such as phenyls, tend to have greater resistance to radiation effects.5,6
Device design, selecting the proper materials, and material processing are fundamental considerations when developing a medical device, but understanding how the device is packaged and sterilized is also useful. The brief summary of each method presented here can provide an initial screening for selection of a sterilization method. Prior to deciding on a method of sterilization, each user must identify the proper sterilization technique by performing tests and analysis on several samples to ensure that its finished parts will be safe and suitable for end-use conditions. Sterilization service providers are in an excellent position to recommend the most effective sterilization methods through either empirical or experience based knowledge.
1 Cort, A. "Choosing a Silicone Adhesive for Medical Devices." Assembly Magazine, 2003.
2 Tilton, G and Kauffman, M. "Sterilization: A review of the basics." Managing Infection Control, 2004: 66-71.
3 Mark, J. "Some interesting things about Polysilioxanes." Acc. Chem. Res. 37, 2004: 946-953.
5 Skiens, WE and Williams, JL. "Ionizing Radiation's Effect on Selected Biomedical Polymers." Biocompatible Polymers, Metals, And Composites, Edited by Szycher, M., Society of Plastics Engineers, Chapter 44, 1983: 1001-1018.
6 Miller, AA. "Radiation Stabilities of Arylmethylsiloxanes." Ind. Eng. Chem. Prod. Res. Dev., 3, 1964: 252-256.
For additional information on the technologies and products discussed in this article, see MDT online at www.mdtmag.com or NuSil Technology, LLC at www.nusil.com.