SAN MATEO, Calif., May 16, 2011 /PRNewswire/ -- On April 28, 2011 the New England Journal of Medicine released highly anticipated one-year results of the ongoing "Comparisons of Age-Related Macular Degeneration Treatments Trials" (CATT).
AlphaDetail, Inc., a leader in global ophthalmology primary market research and influence network mapping, has conducted its latest AlphaPulse™ survey with 120 Ophthalmologists to gauge their reactions on the heels of this important news.
Amy Tsang, a Director at AlphaDetail, explained, "The use of Avastin vs. Lucentis in Wet AMD has been debated among eye care professionals for years, and many anticipated that these results could bring closure to the issue."
While results from the trial confirmed that Avastin is non-inferior to Lucentis on visual acuity efficacy measures, the results related to level of risk associated with serious adverse events are less definitive.
- 68% of surveyed Ophthalmologists are currently aware of the CATT trial results.
- Perceived Benefits of Avastin
- Over three-quarters of Ophthalmologists agree that the results from the CATT trial provide evidence that Avastin's cost savings outweigh its potential risks in Wet AMD.
- Avastin is currently the dominant anti-VEGF therapy used to treat Wet AMD in the United States and this dominance is expected to continue among newly diagnosed patients in the future.
- Based on the CATT trial results, Ophthalmologists intend to switch10-15% of their Wet AMD patients currently on Lucentis to Avastin over the next 6 months.
- Perceived Benefits of Lucentis
- Two-thirds of Ophthalmologists agree that Lucentis' superiority
over Avastin in other efficacy-related attributes, such as lowering
retinal thickness and decreasing retinal fluid, are i
- Two-thirds of Ophthalmologists agree that Lucentis' superiority over Avastin in other efficacy-related attributes, such as lowering retinal thickness and decreasing retinal fluid, are i